VIV Fracture Investigation into 3D Marine Riser with a Circumferential Outside Surface Crack
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vortex‐induced vibration (VIV) is one of the most common dynamic mechanisms that cause damage to marine risers. Hamilton’s variational principle is used to establish a vortex‐induced vibration (VIV) model of a flexible riser in which the wake oscillator model is used to simulate cross‐flow (CF) and inline flow (IL) vortex‐induced forces and their coupling, taking into account the effect of the top tension and internal flow in the riser. The VIV model is solved by combining the Newmark‐ β and Runge–Kutta methods and verified with experimental data from the literature. Combining Option 1 and Option 2 failure assessment diagrams (FADs) in the BS7910 standard, a fracture failure assessment model for a marine riser with circumferential semielliptical outside surface cracks is established. Using the VIV model and FAD failure assessment chart, the effects of riser length, inside/outside flows, and top tension on the VIV response and safety assessment of marine risers with outside surface cracks are investigated. It is shown that increasing the top tension can inhibit the lateral displacement amplitude and bending stress in a riser, but excessive top tension can increase the axial stress in the riser, which counteracts the decrease in the bending stress, so that the effect of top tension on crack safety is not significant. The increasing outside flow velocity significantly increases the lateral vibration amplitude and bending stress in the riser and reduces the crack safety. When other parameters remain unchanged, increasing riser length has no significant effect on the vibration amplitude of the lower part of the riser.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".