L’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée en Afrique du Sud : un objectif irréalisable ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le champ d’application de la législation sud-africaine sur les congés et les prestations de sécurité sociale pour les parents salariés a été élargi en 2018. Cette contribution a pour objet de comparer le cadre législatif résultant de cette modification aux dispositions de la directive 2019/1158/UE. La comparaison est basée sur quatre droits et principes constitutionnels sud-africains qui correspondent à ceux qui sous-tendent la directive. On constate que l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée des parents et des aidants n’a pas reçu l’attention nécessaire dans le programme législatif sud-africain, malgré la générosité de la Constitution. Les décideurs politiques et les législateurs sud-africains pourraient s’inspirer des dispositions de la directive 2019/1158 sur le congé parental et la garde d’enfants pour élaborer un cadre sud-africain unique visant à assurer l’équilibre entre vie professionnelle et vie privée pour les parents et les aidants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".