MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212837985

Забезпечення національної безпеки в процесі реалізації державної політики України

2021· article· uk· W3212837985 on OpenAlex
О. В. Стовбун

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВісник студентського наукового товариства ДонНУ імені Василя Стуса · 2021
Typearticle
Languageuk
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUkrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic administrationNational securityLegislatureRestructuringPolitical scienceState (computer science)International securityOrder (exchange)Field (mathematics)BusinessLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers topical issues of national security in the implementation of state policy of Ukraine. The basic principles of state policy in the field of national security are considered. The reasons for the existence of contradictions in the interaction of public authorities in the field of national security have been identified. Effective cooperation of public authorities in the field of national security requires the improvement of legal and organizational support, as well as the formation of interstate targeted programs in the field of international information security, in the implementation of which Ukraine participates. The need to develop relations with the United States, Great Britain, Canada, Germany, France, other countries, as well as with international organizations in order to ensure international security. The author concludes that a deep restructuring of Ukraine's military security system is needed, which will be based on improving the legislative framework of Ukraine and the practical activities of public authorities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it