MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212840448

Hierarchy of Consumers

2021· article· en· W3212840448 on OpenAlexaff
Gracie Safranovich

Bibliographic record

VenueStudent Research Proceedings · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecomposerHierarchyPyramid (geometry)EcologyEcosystemGeographyBiologyPolitical scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inspired by visual diagrams of ecological pyramids, Hierarchy of Consumers consists of a series of embroidered wall hangings that examine the location and role decomposers play in these visuals. In diagrams of ecological pyramids, decomposers are often depicted as an external entity, separate from the pyramid itself, or are not even present in many versions, despite the importance of decomposition at every level of the pyramid. Through the embroidery, an ecological pyramid is artistically reinterpreted and restructured, showcasing the presence and importance of decomposers in ecosystems by highlighting their role as consumers of all other organisms. Department: Art and Design Faculty Mentor: Leslie Sharpe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudent Research ProceedingsSame topicEnvironmental Philosophy and EthicsFrench-language works237,207