Trauma and the fight against fate: L'île de la demoiselle and La cage by Anne Hebert
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper deals with two Anne Hebert's dramas The cage and L'le de la Demoiselle. These dramatic plays are inspired from the tragic incidents of two women's lives, who were historical persons: Marguerite de la Roque, who lived in France in the 16th century and Marie-Josephte Corriveau, who lived in Canada in the 18th century. Their tragic lives formed the core for a short story of Marguerite de Navarre about Marguerite de la Roque, and a series of books and songs in French and English about the legend of Corriveau. These stories are restored in the texts of Anne Hebert, through a procedure that enlightens the ambiance and the mentalities of these male-dominated eras, responsible for the cruel fate of the two women. The two rewritings review the events and the attitudes against the two women, in a way that makes it possible to see the social structures that engendered their brutal fate. Moreover, the plots restate the historical facts through fiction, and they suggest some ways to escape from the stereotypes that persist, despite the social advances of the modern era.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".