MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212917989

Costo efectividad en el diagnóstico y manejo de esguince de tobillo, basados en los criterios de Ottawa durante los años 2014 y 2015 en el Hospital Isidro Ayora

2018· dissertation· es· W3212917989 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vasquez Bustamante, Carlos Rodríguez

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBusiness, Innovation, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnkle sprainMedicineAnkleGynecologyIncidence (geometry)HumanitiesSurgeryArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract:This study comprised a total of 184 patients, who had a diagnosis of ankle sprain regardless of whether they used the Ottawa criteria. The data obtained were tabulated and plotted in the Microsoft Excel 2013, then compared with other related studies, evidencing that men were the ones with the highest incidence of ankle sprain, constituting 54.3%. The main production mechanism was fall (61.40%). Regarding the applicability of the Ottawa rules, it was only 0.5% (one patient), and the most applied diagnostic method was anteroposterior and lateral ankle radiography performed in 56.5% of patients. The direct cost of the imaging tests (RX) during the two years was $ 2.008.50. Plus the indirect costs evidenced a total of $ 7. 135.55. With which it is concluded that in the Isidro Ayora Hospital, the Ottawa criteria are not applied as a diagnostic tool. Its disuse leads to greater spending in the public system and more time is spent for the diagnosis of ankle sprain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBusiness, Innovation, and EconomyFrench-language works237,207