MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3212929447 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.202731-f

Cancer de l’endomètre

2021· article· fr· W3212929447 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mara Sobel, Andrea N. Simpson, Sarah E. Ferguson

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemWomen's College HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyEndometrial cancerCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 2017, l’incidence et le taux de mortalité du cancer de l’endomètre étaient de 35,7 et de 5,3 par 100 000, respectivement et les 2 sont en hausse[1][1]. Le cancer de type I est de bas grade et comporte un bon pronostic. Le type II est de haut grade et est souvent détecté à un stade avanc

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2380.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicMultiple and Secondary Primary CancersFrench-language works237,207