Cerebral perfusion imaging: Hypoxia-induced deoxyhemoglobin or gadolinium?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Assessment of resting cerebrovascular perfusion measures (mean transit time, cerebral blood flow and cerebral blood volume) with magnetic resonance imaging currently requires the intravascular injection of the dynamic susceptibility contrast agent gadolinium. An initial comparison between hypoxia-induced deoxyhemoglobin and gadolinium was made for these measures in six healthy participants. A bolus of deoxyhemoglobin is generated in the lung via transient hypoxia induced by an available computer-controlled gas blender technology employing sequential gas delivery (RespirAct™). We hypothesised and confirmed perfusion measures from both susceptibility contrast agents would yield similar spatial patterns of cerebrovascular perfusion measures. We conclude that hypoxia-induced deoxyhemoglobin, an endogenously, non-invasively generated, non-allergenic, non-toxic, recyclable, environmentally innocuous molecule, may be suitable to become the first new magnetic resonance imaging susceptibility contrast agent introduction since gadolinium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".