MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213111692 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.024

Properties of Metal Extrusion Additive Manufacturing and Its Application in Digital Supply Chain Management

2021· article· en· W3213111692 on OpenAlexaff
Zahraa Lotfi, Amir Mostafapur, Ahmad Barari

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManufacturing engineeringSupply chainProduction (economics)Discrete manufacturingProduct (mathematics)Digital manufacturingComputer scienceDigital economyProduct lifecycle3D printingBusinessIndustrial organizationIndustrial engineeringCommerceNew product developmentMechanical engineeringEngineeringEconomicsMarketingMathematicsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fourth Industrial Revolution with a global demand for digital product life-cycle and the digital economy. The pervasiveness of internet of things, sensors, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and particularly digital manufacturing and digital supply chain management led to the formation and development of the digital economy. A digital device alters from an auxiliary tool to an essential production element when the cost of production is low and the needs for inventory is minimized, so that it can be used for different financial levels. In fact, the development of digital production systems and supply chain will not only affect how the supply chain is managed, but also will define the concurrency of the production with the other activities in product life-cycle. In this paper, the role of Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing (MEAM) on Digital Production Systems and supply chain management is investigated. It is discussed how MEAM is comparable to the other metal 3D printing methods, in terms of machine cost, printing and post-processing. In addition, it is discussed that considering overall mechanical properties of the final products, production requirement, and cost what can be expected as the role of MEAM in digital production’s economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207