MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213217244 · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00498-8

Ethical considerations for introducing RTS,S/AS01 in countries with moderate to high Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission

2021· article· en· W3213217244 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff D’Souza, David Nderitu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Global Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMalaria Research and Control
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalariaPlasmodium falciparumMalaria vaccineTransmission (telecommunications)VirologyMedicineMalaria preventionImmunologyEnvironmental healthHealth servicesComputer sciencePopulationTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Oct 6, 2021, WHO recommended the widespread use of the RTS,S/ASO1 malaria vaccine (Mosquirix; GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK) among children in areas with moderate to high Plasmodium falciparum malaria transmission.1 This recommendation was made despite RTS,S showing only a 30% reduction in preventing deadly severe malaria, falling short of the WHO effectiveness threshold of 75%, and in light of promising vaccines—such as the R21/Matrix-M—under clinical development.2–4

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Global HealthSame topicMalaria Research and ControlFrench-language works237,207