MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213228212 · doi:10.18280/jesa.540508

Novel Hybrid Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Adaptive Backstepping Control for a Class of Uncertain Discrete-Time Nonlinear Systems

2021· article· en· W3213228212 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdelouaheb Boukhalfa, Khatir Khettab, Najib Essounbouli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Européen des Systèmes Automatisés · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)MathematicsNonlinear systemBounded functionController (irrigation)BacksteppingEstimatorInterval (graph theory)Fuzzy control systemFuzzy logicDiscrete time and continuous timeAdaptive controlAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemAdaptive estimatorType (biology)Mathematical optimizationComputer scienceControl (management)Artificial intelligenceStatisticsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Novel hybrid backstepping interval type-2fuzzy adaptive control (HBT2AC) for uncertain discrete-time nonlinear systems is presented in this paper. The systems are assumed to be defined with the aid of discrete equations with nonlinear uncertainties which are considered as modeling errors and external unknown disturbances, and that the observed states are considered disturbed. The adaptive fuzzy type-2 controller is designed, where the fuzzy inference approach based on extended single-input rule modules (SIRMs) approximate the modeling errors, non-measurable states and adjustable parameters are estimated using derived weighted simplified least squares estimators (WSLS). We can prove that the states are bounded and the estimation errors stand in the neighborhood of zero. The efficiency of the approach is proved by simulation for which the root mean squares criteria are used which improves control performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal Européen des Systèmes AutomatisésSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207