MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213271278 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-154022

Updated Results from a Phase II Study of Hyper-CVAD with Sequential Blinatumomab in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2021· article· en· W3213271278 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nicholas J. Short, Hagop Kantarjian, Farhad Ravandi, Xuelin Huang, Philip A. Thompson, Alessandra Ferrajoli, Tapan M. Kadia, Nitin Jain, Yesid Alvarado, Musa Yılmaz, Joseph D. Khoury, Jeffrey L. Jorgensen, Sa A. Wang, Steven M. Kornblau, Marina Konopleva, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Rebecca Garris, Heather Schroeder, Anna Milton, Juan J. Rivera, Glenda Banks, Elias Jabbour

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlinatumomabMedicineMinimal residual diseaseInternal medicineRituximabCytarabineOncologyChemotherapyAcute lymphocytic leukemiaMaintenance therapyGastroenterologyLeukemiaImmunologyPediatricsLymphoblastic LeukemiaLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Blinatumomab is highly effective therapy for both the treatment of relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD) after initial ALL therapy. We hypothesized that early incorporation of blinatumomab in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell ALL would lead to deeper and more durable responses, reduce relapses, and improve survival. Methods: Pts 14-59 years of age with newly diagnosed Ph-negative pre-B-cell ALL, including pts who had received no more than 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy, were eligible. Pts were required to have a performance status of ≤3, total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dl, creatinine ≤2 mg/dl, and no significant CNS pathology (with the exception of CNS leukemia). Pts received hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine for up to 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of blinatumomab at standard doses. Pts with CD20+ disease (≥1% cells) received 8 doses of ofatumumab (2000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m 2). Eight administrations of prophylactic IT chemotherapy were given in the first 4 cycles. Maintenance was with alternating blocks of POMP (given in maintenance cycles 1-3, 5-7, 9-11, and 13-15) and blinatumomab (given in maintenance cycles 4, 8, and 12). Beginning with pt #10, those with high-risk disease features (e.g. CRLF2+ by flow cytometry, complex karyotype, KMT2A rearranged, low-hypodiploidy/near triploidy, TP53 mutation, or persistent MRD) started blinatumomab after 2 cycles of hyper-CVAD. Results: 38 evaluable pts have been treated. 6 pts were in complete remission (CR) at enrollment and unevaluable for morphologic response. Pt characteristics of the 38 evaluable pts are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 37 years (range, 17-59 years). At least one high-risk feature was present in 21 pts (55%), including TP53 mutation in 27%, CRLF2+ in 19%, and an adverse-risk karyotype in 32%. 84% of pts received ofatumumab or rituximab. Among 32 pts with active disease at study entry, 100% achieved CR, with 81% achieving CR after the first cycle (Table 1). MRD negativity by 6-color flow cytometry was achieved in 22/26 responding pts (85%) after 1 cycle and 37/38 pts (97%) overall. The 60-day mortality rate was 0%. With a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 11-55 months), the 3-year continuous remission and OS rates were 80% and 83%, respectively (Figure 1). Overall, 5 pts (13%) relapsed, 13 (34%) underwent allogeneic SCT in first remission (including 2 additional pts who relapsed post-SCT), 1 died in CR (possible pulmonary embolism), and 19 (50%) remain in continuous remission and are currently on treatment or have completed maintenance. All relapses occurred in pts with established poor-risk features and no relapses have occurred beyond 2 years from the start of treatment. OS with hyper-CVAD plus blinatumomab compares favorably to a historical cohort of pts treated with hyper-CVAD plus ofatumumab (3-year OS 83% versus 66%, respectively; P=0.2). Treatment was overall well-tolerated. Four pts developed grade 2-3 cytokine release syndrome (grade 2, n=3; grade 3, n=1) which resolved with corticosteroids and interruption of blinatumomab. Overall, 16 (42%) pts had a neurological adverse event of any grade due to blinatumomab. Four pts (11%) developed grade 3 neurologic toxicity related to blinatumomab, all of which was transient and reversible. Only one pt discontinued blinatumomab due to blinatumomab-related adverse event (grade 2 encephalopathy and dysphasia). Conclusion: Hyper-CVAD with sequential blinatumomab is highly effective as frontline treatment of Ph-negative B-cell ALL, with an overall MRD negativity rate of 97% and a 3-year OS rate of 83%. This study shows the potential benefit of incorporating frontline blinatumomab into the treatment of younger adults with ALL and also shows that reduction of chemotherapy in this context is feasible. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Short: Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; NGMBio: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kantarjian: Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Jazz: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Ascentage: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria. Ravandi: Taiho: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Astex: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Honoraria, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Xencor: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Syros Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Thompson: Pharmacyclics: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Gilead: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding, Expert Testimony; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Other: Institution: Advisory/Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding; Amgen: Other: Institution: Honoraria, Research Grant/Funding. Ferrajoli: BeiGene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board . Kadia: Astellas: Other; Genentech: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Cellonkos: Other; Pfizer: Consultancy, Other; Pulmotech: Other; Amgen: Other: Grant/research support; Cure: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Other: Grant/research support; AstraZeneca: Other; Liberum: Consultancy; Ascentage: Other; Genfleet: Other; Jazz: Consultancy; Dalichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Aglos: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Grant/research support. Jain: Janssen: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Servier: Honoraria, Research Funding; Beigene: Honoraria; Cellectis: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Aprea Therapeutics: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Alvarado: Sun Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; CytomX Therapeutics: Consultancy; FibroGen: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; BerGenBio: Research Funding; MEI Pharma: Research Funding. Yilmaz: Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Khoury: Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Angle: Research Funding; Kiromic: Research Funding. Wang: Stemline Therapeutics: Honoraria. Konopleva: KisoJi: Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Cellectis: Other: grant support; Calithera: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights, Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Forty Seven: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: research funding pending, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Ablynx: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support; AstraZeneca: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Agios: Other: grant support, Research Funding. Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Blinatumomab in the frontline setting for B-cell ALL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207