MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213342586 · doi:10.1155/2021/2798351

Near-Field Route Optimization-Supported Polar Ice Navigation via Maritime Radar Videos

2021· article· en· W3213342586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xinwei Lin, Shengzheng Wang, Xuesheng Zhang, Tsung-Hsuan Hsieh, Zhen Sun, Tingliu Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsVisibilityCrewComputer scienceRadarSearch and rescueArcticHeading (navigation)Marine engineeringField (mathematics)Routing (electronic design automation)SimulationReal-time computingAeronauticsMeteorologyEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceGeographyAerospace engineeringRobotGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The accurate design of ship routing plans in arctic areas is not easy, considering that navigation conditions (e.g., weather, visibility, and ice thickness) may change frequently. A ship’s crew identifies sea ice in arctic channels with the help of radar echoes, and ship maneuvering decisions are made to avoid navigation interference. Ship officials must manually and consistently change the ship’s route of travel, which is time-consuming and tedious. To address this issue, we propose a near-field route optimization model for the purpose of automatically selecting an optimal route with the help of radar echo images. The ship near-field route optimization model uses a multiobjective optimal strategy considering factors of minimum navigation risk and steaming distance. We verified the model’s performance with the support of the Xuelong voyage dataset. This research finding can help a ship’s crew to design more reasonable navigation routes in polar channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.586
Threshold uncertainty score0.418

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207