MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213357889 · doi:10.5937/zzk2102083k

Residual stress management: Recent advances in engineering methods for non-destructive measurement and beneficial redistribution of residual stresses

2021· article· en· W3213357889 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob I. Kleiman

Bibliographic record

VenueZavarivanje i zavarene konstrukcije · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsIntegrity Testing Laboratory (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidual stressWeldingResidualStructural engineeringFinite element methodEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceMechanical engineeringComposite materialAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welding is used widely in the automotive industry for joining a variety of structural components and parts. Of paramount importance in these structures are their engineering properties, such as fatigue life, distortions, dimensional stability and corrosion resistance that can be affected considerably by the presence of residual stresses (RS). The knowledge of RS and the ability to control their distribution in welded structures is critical when evaluating their fatigue life and preventing catastrophic failures. An engineering concept of residual stress management (RSM) has been developed that addresses all aspects of residual stresses in structural elements. RSM includes three major stages in stress management, i.e. RS determination, RS analysis and RS redistribution. Using this approach, stresses in structures and materials can be evaluated in each specific case either theoretically or experimentally and the performance and fatigue behavior of such structures optimized. This paper is built as an overview of the RSM concept and its application in the fields of non-destructive measurement of residual and applied stresses and in treatment of structures with residual stresses to achieve better performance and longer fatigue life. All three stages of the RSM concept will be discussed and for each of the stages practical engineering approach examples will be given. An example of a project in which the residual stress distribution in a filet welded joint was measured, analyzed and changed by post-weld treatment will be presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the RSM approach. The advancements in the modern tools used in this project for non-destructive measurement of residual stresses using an ultrasonic computerized complex for residual stress measurement and the ultrasonic peening for redistribution of the residual stresses that allowed improving the quality of the welds and increasing their fatigue life will also be presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZavarivanje i zavarene konstrukcijeSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207