MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213384873 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.245424

Green's functions of the Boltzmann transport equation with the full scattering matrix for phonon nanoscale transport beyond the relaxation-time approximation

2021· article· en· W3213384873 on OpenAlexafffund
Vazrik Chiloyan, Samuel Huberman, Zhiwei Ding, Jonathan Mendoza, A. A. Maznev, Keith A. Nelson, Gang Chen

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal properties of materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBoltzmann equationPhononScatteringDebyePhysicsDebye modelConvection–diffusion equationThermal conductivityCondensed matter physicsGrapheneDistribution functionMaterials scienceComputational physicsMechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phonon Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) has been widely utilized to study thermal transport in solids. While for a number of materials the exact solution to the BTE has been obtained for a uniform heat flow, problems arising in micro/nanoscale heat transport have been analyzed within the relaxation time approximation (RTA). Since the RTA breaks down at temperatures low compared to the Debye temperature, this approximation prevents the study of an important class of high Debye temperature materials such as diamond, graphite, graphene, and some other two-dimensional materials. We present a full scattering matrix formalism that goes beyond the RTA approximation and obtain a Green's function solution for the linearized BTE, which leads to an explicit expression for the phonon distribution and temperature field produced by an arbitrary spatiotemporal distribution of heat sources in an unbounded medium. The presented formalism is capable of describing a wide range of phenomena, from heat dissipation by nanoscale hot spots to the propagation of second sound waves. We provide numerical results for graphene for a spatially sinusoidal heating profile and discuss the importance of using the full scattering matrix compared to the RTA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicThermal properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207