PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF THE EXCAVATIONS AT THE NAйRY II NECROPOLIS DATING TO THE SECOND HALF OF THE FIRST MILLENNIUM AD IN THE CONTEXT OF THE STUDIES OF BURIAL SITES IN THE NORTHERN REGIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматриваются материалы раскопок некрополя Навры II (Мядельский район Минской области), проводившихся в 2017-2020 гг. А. Н. Плавинским, Н. А. Плавинским и В. Н. Тарасевич. На протяжении четырех лет раскопок в некрополе Навры II было вскрыто 733 кв. м. В результате проведенных исследований было выявлено, что могильник состоит из курганов с погребениями по обряду кремации и бескурганных кремаций. В функционировании некрополя может быть выделено два культурно-хронологических горизонта. К первому относятся курганы, датирующиеся третьей четвертью I тыс. н. э. Ко второму принадлежат бескурганные погребения по обряду кремации, которые могут быть отнесены к культуре смоленско-полоцких длинных курганов и на данный момент датированы только в широких рамках существования культуры VIII - началом / первой половиной XI в. The article examines the materials from the excavations of the necropolis Naury II (Miadziel district Minsk region), carried out in 2017-2020 by A. Plavinski, M. Plavinski and V. Tarasevich. During four years of excavations in the necropolis Naury II 733 sq. meters were studied. As a result of the research it was revealed that the necropolis consists of kurgan barrows with cremation burials and graves with cremations without kurgans. Two cultural and chronological horizons can be identified in the necropolis functioning. The first horizon includes kurgans dating back to the third quarter of I millennium AD. The second horizon includes burials without cremations, which can be attributed to the culture of the Smolensk-Pototsk long barrows which falls within the broad range of the 8th - early / first half of the 11th centuries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".