MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3213484336 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4611421

Microbial 16S rRNA gene (DNA) and transcripts (cDNA) along a boreal soil-freshwater-estuary continuum

2021· dataset· en· W3213484336 on OpenAlexaff
Masumi Stadler, Clara Ruiz‐González, Trista J. Vick‐Majors, Paul A. del Giorgio

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
Keywords16S ribosomal RNAEstuaryBiologyGeneComplementary DNAGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This repository stores the processed files of the 16S rRNA sequencing reads (DNA and cDNA) of the La Romaine project, which were processed through the DADA2 pipeline. Files are '.rds' files and/or '.csv' files readable by the open statistical software R. The project is part of the Industrial Research Chair in Carbon Biogeochemistry in Boreal Aquatic systems (CarBBAS Chair) led by Paul A. del Giorgio. Samples were pooled by plate ID and season to be processed by DADA2. The number before each '*_seqtab.rds' file corresponds to a pool. ID details are in "splitdf_new.rds". Raw sequences can be found on SRA under the Bioproject number: PRJNA693020. Intermediate processing files are stored here. And scripts are available on Github. Files are being uploaded as manuscripts are published. Currently available files: 2015-2017: 16S rRNA gene and transcripts (DNA and cDNA) in spring, summer, autumn (shallow sequencing) Part of the manuscript: "Terrestrial connectivity, upstream aquatic history and seasonality shape bacterial community assembly within a large boreal aquatic network". The ISME Journal. 2021.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology→French-language works237,207→