MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213488383 · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100386

Transcriptomic profiling of whole blood in 22q11.2 reciprocal copy number variants reveals that cell proportion highly impacts gene expression

2021· article· en· W3213488383 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Behavior & Immunity - Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersClinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los AngelesNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of California, Los AngelesBrain and Behavior Research FoundationSimons Foundation Autism Research InitiativeSimons Foundation
KeywordsTranscriptomeBiologyCopy-number variationGeneGene expressionGeneticsLocus (genetics)Gene expression profilingPhenotypeGene duplicationCell typeCellGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

22q11.2 reciprocal copy number variants (CNVs) offer a powerful quasi-experimental "reverse-genetics" paradigm to elucidate how gene dosage (i.e., deletions and duplications) disrupts the transcriptome to cause further downstream effects. Clinical profiles of 22q11.2 CNV carriers indicate that disrupted gene expression causes alterations in neuroanatomy, cognitive function, and psychiatric disease risk. However, interpreting transcriptomic signal in bulk tissue requires careful consideration of potential changes in cell composition. We first characterized transcriptomic dysregulation in peripheral blood from reciprocal 22q11.2 CNV carriers using differential expression analysis and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify modules of co-expressed genes. We also assessed for group differences in cell composition and re-characterized transcriptomic differences after accounting for cell type proportions and medication usage. Finally, to explore whether CNV-related transcriptomic changes relate to downstream phenotypes associated with 22q11.2 CNVs, we tested for associations of gene expression with neuroimaging measures and behavioral traits, including IQ and psychosis or ASD diagnosis. 22q11.2 deletion carriers (22qDel) showed widespread expression changes at the individual gene as well as module eigengene level compared to 22q11.2 duplication carriers (22qDup) and controls. 22qDup showed increased expression of 5 genes within the 22q11.2 locus, and CDH6 located outside of the locus. Downregulated modules in 22qDel implicated altered immune and inflammatory processes. Celltype deconvolution analyses revealed significant differences between CNV and control groups in T-cell, mast cell, and macrophage proportions; differential expression of individual genes between groups was substantially attenuated after adjusting for cell composition. Individual gene, module eigengene, and cell proportions were not significantly associated with psychiatric or neuroanatomic traits. Our findings suggest broad immune-related dysfunction in 22qDel and highlight the importance of understanding differences in cell composition when interpreting transcriptomic changes in clinical populations. Results also suggest novel directions for future investigation to test whether 22q11.2 CNV effects on macrophages have implications for brain-related microglial function that may contribute to psychiatric phenotypes in 22q11.2 CNV carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it