MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213549718 · doi:10.4018/ijiit.289968

Towards a Conceptual Framework for Customer Intelligence in the Era of Big Data

2021· article· en· W3213549718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataComputer scienceService (business)Service designData as a serviceDominance (genetics)Data scienceService systemConstruct (python library)Knowledge managementService delivery frameworkBusinessMarketingData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dominance of services and service-based products in today's economy highlights the significance of customer intelligence for service offerings. Furthermore, the revolution of big data has generated a vast amount of customer data and reshaped the dimensions of organization, management, and technology within enterprises. The big data era also acknowledges the role of customers for value co-creation. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to propose a service-based framework for customer intelligence in the age of big data, hereafter called the SBCI framework, from the design science and service science approach. It laid the groundwork upon design science; the SBCI framework is proposed with the detailed artefacts, including construct, model, method, and instantiation. The framework also reflects service science through the three levels: 1) the network of service systems level for service proposal, 2) the service system level for service creation, and 3) the service level for service operation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it