MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-time Reactive Power Compensation by Distributed Generation Simulated using GridLAB-D and PSIM

2021· article· en· W3213551409 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAC powerCompensation (psychology)Metering modeGridComputer scienceDistributed generationVoltageInverterPower (physics)Electrical engineeringElectronic engineeringEngineeringRenewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the recent increase of inverter-based distributed generation (DG), more opportunities for grid support are being explored. Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), allows monitoring and communication in the distribution grid, which could enable real-time optimal reactive power compensation by DG units. In this study, a real-time simulation using GridLAB-d and PSIM is used to explore this in a British Columbia, Canada grid. State estimation followed by reactive power optimisation is applied in real-time to both under-voltage and over-voltage grids. This process is shown to improve grid performance at very low cost, by either reducing power loss in the lines, mitigating reverse power flow or improving other objective(s) determined by the utility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.677

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207