MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213559992 · doi:10.23977/aetp.2021.58012

Research on the Influence of Sports APP on College Students' Physical Exercise

2021· article· en· W3213559992 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Gu, Jianping Zhang, Jianyu Zhang, Zhigang Li, Xiongchao Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Educational Technology and Psychology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetSports scienceMedical educationPsychologyPhysical educationSport managementService (business)AdvertisingConsumption (sociology)MultimediaMathematics educationComputer scienceWorld Wide WebMedicineMarketingPublic relationsBusinessSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the further development of the Internet, more and more information is obtained from mobile phones, and sports apps are designed to meet the needs of mass sports activities, with the help of advanced science and technology to develop a service platform exclusively for sports enthusiasts. In this paper, through the literature method, questionnaire survey method, mathematical statistics method and logic analysis method, the effect of sports APP on the physical exercise of college students in Yunnan Province in Yunnan Province was studied. The study found that the use of sports apps by college students has become a relatively common phenomenon. Sports apps have significantly increased college students' sports consumption and provided college students with a more active physical exercise goal and attitude. It is recommended that APP developers further improve the existing sports APPs, and college students should use sports APPs reasonably, and appropriately introduce sports APPs into college physical education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.526

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.559
Teacher spread0.509 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Educational Technology and PsychologySame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207