Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation is Effective in Frail COPD Patients with Chronic Respiratory Failure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Daily life disability and vulnerability is often reported in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic respiratory failure. Although pulmonary rehabilitation is feasible in this population, its benefits on functional status and physical frailty is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the short- and medium-term effectiveness of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation program in COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure. We also evaluate the impact of frailty status on the efficacy of the intervention. Forty-seven participants underwent an 8-week home-based program. Functional capacity, physical frailty (Fried criteria), exercise tolerance, health-related quality of life, general fatigue, and anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed at baseline (M0), and at 8 weeks (M2) and 8 months (M8) following study inclusion. For the group as a whole, functional capacity, physical frailty, health-related quality of life, and fatigue scores were all improved at M2 and M8 (p<0.05), while exercise tolerance and depressive symptoms were only improved at M8 (p<0.01). However, when the group was divided according to frailty status, only the frail patients had improved health-related quality of life, general fatigue, and anxiety and depressive symptom scores after pulmonary rehabilitation (p<0.05). In COPD patients with chronic respiratory failure, home-based pulmonary rehabilitation may be effective for improving functional capacity, physical frailty, and health-related quality of life at short- and medium-term. Physical frailty was not a barrier for benefiting from the intervention, and almost 80% of the patients who were frail prior to the program improved their frailty status after pulmonary rehabilitation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it