Synthesis and Characterization of a Pyrene-Labeled Gemini Surfactant Sensitive to the Polarity of Its Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The cationic gemini surfactant PyO-3-12 was designed to include two dimethyl ammonium groups, one dodecyl tail, and 1-pyrenemethyl hexyl ether tail into the structure of the surfactant. The pyrenyl label ensured that the fluorescence of pyrene could be employed to probe the behavior of PyO-3-12 at the molecular level. The introduction of the oxygen atom in the β-position to pyrene was found to be critical for restoring the sensitivity of the pyrenyl label to the polarity of its environment. The properties of PyO-3-12 were characterized in water by surface tension and a fluorescence methodology that involved the global model-free analysis (MFA) of the pyrene monomer and excimer fluorescence decays to provide quantitative information about the state (unassociated-vs-aggregated) of PyO-3-12. The MFA was combined with a fluorescence quenching study with 2,6-dinitrotoluene to determine the size of the PyO-3-12 micelles. PyO-3-12 was found to behave like a typical gemini surfactant, exhibiting a critical micelle concentration (CMC) of 0.38 (±0.05) mM and an aggregation number (Nagg) equal to 23 (±2). Besides allowing PyO-3-12 to probe the polarity of its environment, the oxygen atom in the β-position next to pyrene brought some pyrenyl labels closer to the interface between the micellar interior and the aqueous phase, in a process that increased the effective volume of the hydrophobic part of PyO-3-12. This led to an increase in the packing parameter of PyO-3-12 and, consequently, an increase in Nagg compared to the Nagg value of 14 (±0.2) obtained for Py-3-12, a gemini surfactant, whose chemical structure was similar to that of PyO-3-12 but without the oxygen in the β-position to pyrene. The methodology described in this study to prepare and characterize pyrene-labeled surfactants is general and can be applied to study any pyrene-labeled surfactant and its interactions with oppositely charged macromolecules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".