MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep Recurrent Semi-Supervised EEG Representation Learning for Emotion Recognition

2021· article· en· W3213630669 on OpenAlexaff
Guangyi Zhang, Ali Etemad

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMachine learningElectroencephalographyUnsupervised learningPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningSupervised learningBenchmark (surveying)Context (archaeology)Feature learningArtificial neural networkPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

EEG-based emotion recognition often requires sufficient labeled training samples to build an effective computational model. Labeling EEG data, on the other hand, is often expensive and time-consuming. To tackle this problem and reduce the need for output labels in the context of EEG-based emotion recognition, we propose a semi-supervised pipeline to jointly exploit both unlabeled and labeled data for learning EEG representations. Our semi-supervised framework consists of both unsupervised and supervised components. The unsupervised part maximizes the consistency between original and reconstructed input data using an autoencoder, while simultaneously the supervised part minimizes the cross-entropy between the input and output labels. We evaluate our framework using both a stacked autoencoder and an attention-based recurrent autoencoder. We test our framework on the large-scale SEED EEG dataset and compare our results with several other popular semi-supervised methods. Our semi-supervised framework with a deep attention-based recurrent autoencoder consistently outperforms the benchmark methods, even when small sub-sets (3%, 5% and 10%) of the output labels are available during training, achieving a new stateof-the-art semi-supervised performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207