MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213631548 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.089

Machine-Learning Digital Twin of Overlay Metal Deposition for Distortion Control of Panel Structures

2021· article· en· W3213631548 on OpenAlexaff
Mahyar Asadi, Michael Fernández, Majid Tanbakuei Kashani, M. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsSurrey Memorial Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFidelityDistortion (music)OverlayArtificial intelligenceDistributed computingTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cyber-manufacturing relies on smart digital-twins of manufacturing processes that can quickly act for making a wise decision. However, the cognitive computing part of the digital-twin becomes time-intensive beyond the requirement of a smart system when it uses simulation tools that solve governing constitutive equations in the form of partial differential equations (PDE). On the other hand, many artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) solutions rely on a large data set that does not exist in many manufacturing systems. We build a hybrid digital-twin that takes advantage of an ML-based digital-twin for quick response while gaining fidelity through adaptive learning with a PDE-based digital-twin. We use our hybrid digital-twin for active exploration of various overlay metal deposition patterns in real-time. This tool enables engineers to explore and compare many patterns they need to assess metal deposition scenarios with no delay for computational time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.486

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207