Improved Noise Performance of CMOS Poly Gate Single-Photon Avalanche Diodes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The noise performance of three types of n+/p-well single-photon avalanche diodes (SPADs) fabricated in a standard 180 nm CMOS technology is studied. The SPADs had different poly gate configurations: no poly gate (SPAD_NG), a dummy floating poly gate (SPAD_DG), and a field poly gate connected to the n+cathode (SPAD_FG). The measurement results of dark count rate and afterpulsing showed that the SPAD_DG had better noise performance compared to the SPAD_NG. This is because the dummy poly gate pushed the shallow trench isolation away from the active region of the SPAD, thus reducing the dark noise generated from the Si-SiO2interface. The measurement results also revealed that the noise performance can be further improved by connecting the poly gate to the n+cathode. The voltage on the poly gate in SPAD_FG reduced the electric field in the n-well guard ring (GR) region, thus reducing the carriers from the GR region that can enter the active region of SPADs and initiate dark counts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".