Resting-state functional connectivity of the amygdala subregions in unmedicated patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder before and after cognitive behavioural therapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) is considered an effective first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, the neural basis of CBT for OCD has not yet been elucidated. The role of the amygdala in OCD and its functional coupling with the cerebral cortex have received increasing attention, and may provide new understanding of the neural basis of CBT for OCD. METHODS: We acquired baseline resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) scans from 45 unmedicated patients with OCD and 40 healthy controls; we then acquired another wave of resting-state fMRI scans from the patients with OCD after 12 weeks of CBT. We performed seed-based resting-state functional connectivity analyses of the amygdala subregions to examine changes in patients with OCD as a result of CBT. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, patients with OCD showed significantly increased resting-state functional connectivity at baseline between the left basolateral amygdala and the right middle frontal gyrus, and between the superficial amygdala and the right cuneus. In patients with OCD who responded to CBT, we found decreased resting-state functional connectivity after CBT between the amygdala subregions and the visual association cortices and increased resting-state functional connectivity between the amygdala subregions and the right inferior parietal lobe. Furthermore, these changes in resting-state functional connectivity were positively associated with changes in scores on the compulsion or obsession subscales of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale. LIMITATIONS: Because of the lack of a second scan for healthy controls after 12 weeks, our results may have been confounded by other variables. CONCLUSION: Our findings yield insights into the pathophysiology of OCD; they also reveal the potential neural changes elicited by CBT, and thus have implications for guiding effective treatment strategies with CBT for OCD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".