MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213734105 · doi:10.4000/rdctss.1806

The Quebec System for Protection Against Psychological Harassment in the Workplace: Case Law Peculiarities and Issues

2018· article· en· W3213734105 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julie Bourgault, Anne-Marie Laflamme

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité sociale · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorkplace Violence and Bullying
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université LavalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarassmentLawPolitical scienceCriminologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduced in 2004 as part of the Act Respecting Labour Standards (hereinafter referred to as the LSA), special provisions for protection against psychological harassment in Quebec were added to the pre-existing legal framework­ The public policy provisions of the LSA define psychological harassment in the workplace and require employers under Quebec jurisdiction to prevent or put a stop to harassment, whether the alleged harasser is a representative of the employer or a fellow employee. This...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.886
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de droit comparé du travail et de la sécurité socialeSame topicWorkplace Violence and BullyingFrench-language works237,207