MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213737100 · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.1c03140

Copolymerization of Styrene with 2-Ethylhexyl Acrylate and 2-Ethylhexyl Methacrylate by Semibatch Emulsion Polymerization Using BlocBuilderMA as Macroinitiator

2021· article· en· W3213737100 on OpenAlexaff
Roberto González‐Blanco, Michael F. Cunningham, Enrique Saldívar‐Guerra

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
KeywordsCopolymerEmulsion polymerizationStyrenePolystyrenePolymer chemistryAcrylateMaterials scienceMethyl methacrylateChemical engineeringPolymerizationRadical polymerizationParticle sizePolymerComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using BlocBuilderMA (BB) as a macroinitiator, stable and controlled latexes of polystyrene (PS), poly 2-ethylhexyl acrylate (PEHA), poly 2-ethylhexyl methacrylate (PEHMA), and copolymers PS- b -PEHA and PS- b -PEHMA with solids contents up to 40 wt % were obtained. Using different concentrations of styrene (St) in the nucleation step, it was possible to obtain colloidal dispersions with particle size ranging from ≈72 nm to ≈500 nm, conversions up to ≈100%, nitroxide efficiencies ( N Eff ) up to ≈0.93, and number-average molecular weights ( M n ) from ≈8000 to ≈81 000 g/mol. These polymerizations were conducted using a very simple and fast process because it was not necessary to ionize BB, to use alkaline conditions, or to have a long seed formation step since the seed is formed in situ during the heating ramp. These features make this process a good candidate for scale-up and eventual industrial production.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAdvanced Polymer Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207