MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213745200 · doi:10.1109/sips52927.2021.00049

Hartley Stochastic Computing For Convolutional Neural Networks

2021· article· en· W3213745200 on OpenAlexaff
Seyyed Hasan Mozafari, James J. Clark, Warren J. Gross, Brett H. Meyer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Convolutional neural networkSpeedupFourier transformAlgorithmParallel computingFast Fourier transformFLOPSField-programmable gate arrayComputational scienceArtificial neural networkArtificial intelligenceComputer hardwareMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy consumption and the latency of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are two important factors that limit their applications specifically for embedded devices. Fourier-based frequency domain (FD) convolution is a promising low-cost alter-native to conventional implementations in the spatial domain (SD) for CNNs. FD convolution performs its operation with point-wise multiplications. However, in CNNs, the overhead for the Fourier-based FD-convolution surpasses its computational saving for small filter sizes. In this work, we propose to implement convolutional layers in the FD using the Hartley transformation (HT) instead of the Fourier transformation. We show that the HT can reduce the convolution delay and energy consumption even for small filters. With the HT of parameters, we replace convolution with point-wise multiplications. HT lets us compress input feature maps, in all convolutional layer, before convolving them with filters. To optimize the hardware implementation of our method, we utilize stochastic computing (SC) to perform the point-wise multiplications in the FD. In this regard, we re-formalize the HT to better match with SC. We show that, compared to conventional Fourier-based convolution, Hartley SC-based convolution can achieve 1.33x speedup, and 1.23x energy saving on a Virtex 7 FPGA when we implement AlexNet over CIFAR-10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207