MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213785306 · doi:10.7202/1083029ar

Le lien entre préférences musicales et attitudes politiques au Québec

2021· article· fr· W3213785306 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Emmanuel Heisbourg

Bibliographic record

VenuePolitique et Sociétés · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Cultural Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceLienArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous avons mesuré à l’aide d’un sondage sur un échantillon étudiant le lien entre les préférences musicales et les attitudes politiques, une première dans le contexte québécois. Nous observons que le lien entre les préférences musicales et les attitudes politiques est faible. Néanmoins nos résultats indiquent qu’une appréciation pour des genres musicaux « plus politiques » (rock, métal, hip-hop, folk) est associée à l’évaluation par les participants de certains partis fédéraux/provinciaux et à certaines attitudes politiques (intérêt politique, idéologie et conservatisme économique). La force de cette relation n’est pas affectée par l’implication musicale des participants. Nous observons également que la nature de cette relation est semblable aux États-Unis et au Québec.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.352 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolitique et SociétésSame topicSocial and Cultural DynamicsFrench-language works237,207