MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213785739 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1455759

Virtual Chip-Seq Predictions Of Binding Of 36 Transcription Factor In Roadmap Epigenomics Project Tissues

2018· dataset· en· W3213785739 on OpenAlexaff
Mehran Karimzadeh, Michael M. Hoffman

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpigenomicsTranscription factorComputer scienceComputational biologyFactor (programming language)ChipBiologyGeneticsDNA methylationGeneProgramming languageGene expressionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dataset contains predictions of Virtual ChIP-seq for binding of 36 transcription factors in Roadmap Epigenomics dataset tissues with matched DNase-seq and RNA-seq data. Tarball contains subfolders for each of the 36 TFs where Virtual ChIP-seq median MCC in validation cell types was > 0.3. Each subfolder contains gzipped BED files. Each file is named as _ _ _ _Predictions.bed.gz. Columns correspond to Chromosome, Start, End, _ _ _ , Posterior probability You can use the posterior probabilities provided in Virchip_PosteriorCutoffs_V3.0.0.tsv. These are posterior probability cutoffs which maximized MCC in H1-hESC cell type, or are set to 0.4 if there was no ChIP-seq data of that TF in H1-hESC (0.4 is the mode of all optimal posterior probability cutoffs in H1-hESC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.034

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207