Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two new graffiti found out in the course of archaeological researcher in “The Upper City” at Phanagoria are published in the article. Both they are dated to the Late Archaic time and relate to private life of the city. The first one is cut on an amphora wall in the shape of rectangle and consists of two lines: 1. Εὔβιος | πυγίσαι – Eubios has indulged in pederasty. It includes one of the earliest case in using of πυγίζω in the ancient Greek world. The second graffito is a private note, cutting on the bottom of black-ware cylix. Its author blames Nysa for something: 1. [Ὦ ἀγα]θὴ Νῦσα. | Ἇ, Ἇ, Ἇ, Ἇ, Ἇ. | Ναί, – Pretty Nysa. Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah! Ah! Yes, exactly! The graffiti have enriched the epigraphical collection in Phanagoria new evidence concerning to anthroponomical data and private relations in the city in the late VI – the first quarter V BC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".