Performance of Mutually Coupled Switched Reluctance Machines in Generating Mode with Sinusoidal Current Excitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes the operation of mutually coupled switched reluctance machines (MCSRMs) at generating mode with sinusoidal current excitation. The sinusoidal current excitation for MCSRMs enables the use of the standard voltage source inverter and the conventional modulation methods such as the space vector modulation. When the MCSRM operates at generating mode, there are infinite number of operating points that can output the same average torque. The differences between those operating points are the corresponding torque ripple, efficiency, and power factor. Thus, the influence of these three factors on the operation of the MCSRM are investigated. Since MCSRMs has no field excitation source, the phase windings of the machine are magnetized from an external source. The amount of the reactive power consumed depends on the direct-and quadrature- axis currents. This means for the same average torque applied on machine shaft, the amount of reactive power can be minimized. A 2kW 12/8 MCSRM is used in the study. The analysis is conducted using FEA and MATLAB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".