MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213844080 · doi:10.22371/05.2002.012

Heritage College: Partnership Leadership as Catalyst to a Multicultural Learning Community

2002· dissertation· en· W3213844080 on OpenAlexaff
Mary Ann Kaczmarski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipPublic relationsAccreditationPolitical sciencePopulationQualitative researchSociologyPedagogyMedical educationMedicineSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heritage College, a four-year, fully accredited, independent, nonprofit college located in rural, south central Washington, serves multicultural populations that have been educationally isolated. It was created against tremendous odds in 1981 by a small, diverse group of committed individuals. An initial study of Heritage College, conducted in 1991, yielded such compelling findings in the areas of leadership, mission, and community, among others, that a more rigorous, in-depth research study was called for. This dissertation is the follow-up study. The president of Heritage College states that the College sees itself as a leadership- and team-oriented institution with a distinctive focus on collaborative leadership, community, caring and commitment, driven by its mission to serve a unique population. Consequently, this qualitative case study serves two purposes: (1) It tests and confirms this hypothesis by identifying specific practices of leadership, community, caring, commitment, and mission as defined by experts in these fields; and (2 )It identifies how Heritage College is unique from the documented literature, specifically in the field of partnership leadership. Data triangulation was achieved through the use of thirty-six interviews with key stakeholders, including students, staff, faculty, administrators, and members of the Board of Directors; formal and informal observations; and the analysis of more than seventy-five College documents. Data analysis was conducted manually and by utilizing QSR NUD*IST, a qualitative research data analysis software program. Partnership is the foundation upon which the College has been established. Not surprisingly, the research findings reinforce that this is an organization where partnership is fundamental in every aspect. Within this overarching quality of partnership that permeates the College, four major themes emerged, partnership being fundamental to each one. Heritage College is: (1) an organization that manifests partnership leadership in all stakeholder groups; (2) a mission-driven organization that is student-centered; (3) a multicultural learning community of respect and inclusion; and (4) an organization where resources and relationships are critical to its ability to thrive. The final dissertation report is a rich, thick description of the importance of partnership leadership in the creation and ongoing operation of Heritage College, as well as the force of commitment and mission in building and sustaining a multicultural learning community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0010.019
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.165
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHigher Education Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207