MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213852252 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1438241

A Non-Lte Model Atmosphere Analysis Of Hot, Hydrogen-Deficient White Dwarfs

2018· article· en· W3213852252 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine Bédard, P. Bergeron, G. Fontaine

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite dwarfAtmosphere (unit)AstrobiologyAstrophysicsAstronomyEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMeteorologyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

White dwarf stars of spectral type DO populate the hot end of the hydrogen-deficient white dwarf cooling sequence. They are characterized by a helium-rich atmosphere, a high effective temperature (Teff > 40,000 K) and a high surface gravity (log g > 7), and thus their spectrum is dominated by broad He II absorption features. Their hydrogen deficiency is thought to result from a so-called born-again evolution, during which a post-AGB star undergoes a late helium-shell flash, bringing the star back to the AGB and causing the remaining hydrogen to be burned or completely mixed in the envelope. In order to further our understanding of hydrogen-deficient white dwarf evolution, we perform a model atmosphere analysis of a large sample of DO stars. Atmospheric parameters are derived by comparing optical spectra to our new grid of non-LTE model atmospheres and synthetic spectra. We also make use of evolutionary sequences to obtain stellar masses and cooling ages. Based on these results, we discuss the physical properties of DO white dwarfs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207