MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3213857716 · doi:10.1061/9780784483701.035

The Compound Impacts of Changing Temperature and Snow Cover on Freeze and Thaw Patterns across Québec

2021· article· en· W3213857716 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shadi Hatami, Ali Nazemi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeo-Extreme 2021 · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowSnow coverEnvironmental scienceClimatologyLatitudeScale (ratio)Atmospheric sciencesMultivariate statisticsPhysical geographyMeteorologyGeographyGeologyMathematicsStatisticsCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seasonal Freeze-Thaw cycles (FT) is a key to environmental processes and socioeconomic activities across northern latitudes. The large-scale dynamics of FT are mainly governed by air temperature and snow depth. We argue that this physical control can be empirically characterized, represented, and simulated by the trivariate dependence structure between FT, temperature, and snow depth. To showcase this, we consider the gridded data of these variables over Québec, Canada, and use canonical vine copulas to formulate the trivariate interdependence between FT, temperature, and snow depth in different grids and ecozones. Our results reveal different dependence structures across Québec ecozones, pointing at the role of landscape in regulating the impacts of snow depth and temperature on FT. Having the trivariate dependence, we use a bottom-up impact assessment approach to address the alterations in FT characteristics under single and compound changes in the temperature and snow depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeo-Extreme 2021→Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→