MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213875173 · doi:10.1364/pcaop.2021.ptu4c.2

Quality Metrics for Atmospherically Distorted Images

2021· article· en· W3213875173 on OpenAlexaff
Donald R. McGaughey, Guy Potvin

Bibliographic record

VenueOSA Imaging and Applied Optics Congress 2021 (3D, COSI, DH, ISA, pcAOP) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImage qualityArtificial intelligenceQuality (philosophy)Ground truthRemote sensingComputer visionImage (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a number of quality metrics for quantifying the quality of atmospherically distorted images and corrected images. Metrics that require a truth image (SSIM, MSE) and no-reference metrics (NIQE, BRISQUE) will be reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.752
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSA Imaging and Applied Optics Congress 2021 (3D, COSI, DH, ISA, pcAOP)Same topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207