MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213958873 · doi:10.1182/blood-2021-153189

Initial Results of Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine in Combination with Quizartinib for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm with <i>FLT3</i> or <i>CBL</i> Mutations

2021· article· en· W3213958873 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tareq Abuasab, Elias Jabbour, Nicholas J. Short, Marina Konopleva, Kelly S. Chien, Shehab Mohamed, Naval Daver, Rashmi Kanagal‐Shamanna, Hagop M. Kantarjian, Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo Montalban‐Bravo

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAzacitidineMedicineTolerabilityHypomethylating agentMyelodysplastic syndromesInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchDecitabineOncologyClinical trialAdverse effectBone marrowBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations occur in about 1% of patients with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and up to 19% at time of failure of hypomethylating agent (HMA). In addition, Casitas B-lineage Lymphoma mutations (CBL) are observed in 10% of patients with MDS/MPN and up to 13-15% of patients with CMML (mainly proliferative type). Preclinical studies suggest that CBL-mutant cells are dependent on FLT3 signaling. Specific targeting of FLT3 and CBL mutations in MDS and MDS/MPN has not been thoroughly evaluated. Methods: We designed a phase I/II clinical trial of Azacitidine in Combination with quizartinib for newly diagnosed patients with MDS and MDS/MPN with detectable FLT3 mutation and/or CBL exon 8 or 9 deletions or point mutations Mutation on patients that are HMA naïve or had prior treatment with HMA. The study included phase I dose escalation portion, following 3+3 design, followed by phase II dose expansion portion. Dose escalation included 3 dose levels of quizartinib on days 1-28 of every cycle: 30, 40 and 60 mg in the addition to azacitidine (75 mg/m 2/day) on days 1-5 each 28-day cycle. The phase II/expansion phase will include two cohorts, Cohort A hypomethylating agent naïve patients and cohort B patients with prior hypomethylating agent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of quizartinib. Secondary objectives include evaluation of overall response per IWG 2006 criteria, in addition to overall survival (OS), duration of response, leukemia-free survival (LFS), relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: At the end date of July 30 th 2021, a total of 6 patients have been enrolled: 4 patients with CMML, one with MDS excess blast and one with atypical Chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML). A total of 5 patients (83%) had normal karyotype and one patient (17%) had complex karyotype. Four patients were enrolled due to FLT3 mutations and 2 due to CBL mutations. Patients characteristics are summarized in Figure 1a. Median number of cycles administered was 3.5 (range 1-6). All patients have achieved response so far with a total of 5 patients (67%) having achieved marrow CR (mCR) including HI in 1 patient, 1 patient had hematologic improvement-erythropoietic (HI-E) with control of leukocytosis and thrombocytosis to normal levels. Response dynamics and clonal changes through the course of therapy are shown in Figure 1b. Reduction of clearance of FLT3-ITD or other FLT3 mutations was observed in all evaluable FLT3-mutant patients with no significant changes in CBL mutant variant allele frequencies observed thus far. With a median follow up of 3.1 months (range 1-12 months), the median response duration is 2.1 months (range 0.5-6.3 months) and the median OS has not been reached with all patients alive at the time of evaluation. A total of 3 patients (50%) have stopped the treatment: 1 patient due to disease relapse, 1 due to progression and the other to proceed to allogenic stem cell transplantation after achieving response to therapy. No dose limiting toxicities (DLT) have been observed to date up to the maximum dose of 40 mg of quizartinib. One patient required dose reductions due to cytopenias with the rest of the patients having recovery of counts to pre-treatment levels. Regarding the grade 3 or more adverse events (AEs): Two patients (33%) had skin infection, one patient (17%) had cardiac arrythmia with Mobitz II AV block and one patient (17%) had lumbar epidural lesion most likely of infectious origin. Conclusion: Preliminary data suggest azacitidine in combination with quizartinib for patients with MDS and MDS/MPN with FLT3 or CBL mutations have acceptable toxicity profile and associated with promising responses. Further follow up with a larger patient cohort are required to emphasize the safety and efficacy of this combination and evaluate depth and duration of response. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Jabbour: Amgen, AbbVie, Spectrum, BMS, Takeda, Pfizer, Adaptive, Genentech: Research Funding. Short: Astellas: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; NGMBio: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Takeda Oncology: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Konopleva: Ablynx: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Ascentage: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Agios: Other: grant support, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights, Research Funding; KisoJi: Research Funding; Cellectis: Other: grant support; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support, Research Funding; Sanofi: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Forty Seven: Other: grant support, Research Funding; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: grant support; Reata Pharmaceuticals: Current holder of stock options in a privately-held company, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Novartis: Other: research funding pending, Patents & Royalties: intellectual property rights; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Grant Support, Research Funding; Calithera: Other: grant support, Research Funding; Rafael Pharmaceuticals: Other: grant support, Research Funding. Daver: Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novimmune: Research Funding; Hanmi: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; FATE Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Trillium: Consultancy, Research Funding; ImmunoGen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sevier: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead Sciences, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Other: Data Monitoring Committee member; Dava Oncology (Arog): Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Syndax: Consultancy; Shattuck Labs: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy; STAR Therapeutics: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Newave: Research Funding. Kantarjian: Aptitude Health: Honoraria; Jazz: Research Funding; KAHR Medical Ltd: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ipsen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; NOVA Research: Honoraria; Precision Biosciences: Honoraria; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria; Astellas Health: Honoraria; Immunogen: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Ascentage: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Taiho Pharmaceutical Canada: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207