Evaporation Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop of HFC-134a Inside a Plate Heat Exchanger
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract An experimental investigation was carried out to provide data on heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop for upward flow of refrigerant 134a in a typical plate heat exchanger. Upflow boiling of R-134a in one channel receives heat from the hot downflow of water in the two adjacent channels. Measurements were conducted on three sets of plates with chevron angles of 0°, 30°, and 60°, and the effects of mean vapor quality, mass flux, and heat flux on the evaporation heat transfer and pressure drop were explored. It was found that the channels with small chevron angle have higher heat transfer than channels with large chevron angle, for both subcooling and vapor quality inlet conditions. It was clear that the heat transfer coefficients were not sensitive to the heat flux but were dependent on the flow conditions (mass velocity and vapour quality). Based on the experimental data, empirical correlations for the evaporation heat transfer enhancement factor and the two-phase pressure drop multipliers were proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".