MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3213999747 · doi:10.32548/2021.me-04231

Nondestructive Evaluation of Electroplating-Induced Hydrogen Embrittlement in Cadmium-Coated High-Strength Steel Using Ultrasonic Surface Waves

2021· article· en· W3213999747 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hamidreza Shahmiri, Martin Viens

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Evaluation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds de recherche du QuébecNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConsortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec
KeywordsMaterials scienceNondestructive testingHydrogen embrittlementSurface roughnessUltrasonic sensorAttenuationElectroplatingSurface finishComposite materialVickers hardness testEmbrittlementMetallurgyAcousticsCorrosionOpticsMicrostructure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of a nondestructive evaluation (NDE) method to detect nascent hydrogen embrittlement (HE) in electroplated high-strength steel parts is becoming important for the aerospace industry. This research investigates the feasibility of surface acoustic waves (SAWs) measurements to distinguish between cadmium (Cd) plated SAE 4340 steel samples with low and high HE susceptibilities. SAWs were generated with a 10 MHz piezoelectric transducer and detected by line scans via a laser Doppler vibrometer setup. Using signal processing algorithms in MATLAB, SAW velocities as well as attenuation coefficients were estimated. Depth profiles of steel hardness near coatings were also evaluated using Vickers microindentation tests. Average steel hardness in not-baked samples was slightly increased. Cd coatings were characterized by laser and optical microscopy methods. Small variations found in thickness and surface roughness of the Cd coatings among the samples did not significantly affect the NDE results. On average, samples in the not-baked condition (high HE risk) exhibited lower SAW attenuation coefficients compared to immediately baked and late-baked conditions (low HE risk). However, it was not possible to distinguish between the manufacturing conditions of individual samples due to overlaps in attenuation measurement results. SAW velocities as estimated by the cross-correlation method were found to be not sensitive to manufacturing conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials EvaluationSame topicHydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metalsFrench-language works237,207