WAS IT LEUCONOSTOC SPECIES? A CASE OF DELAYED-ONSET ENDOPHTHALMITIS PRESENTING 14 YEARS AFTER CATARACT SURGERY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report a case of delayed-onset endophthalmitis presenting 14 years after an uncomplicated cataract surgery. METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: An 89-year-old pseudophakic man complained of redness and reduced visual acuity in his right eye. He had no history of trauma or systemic infection, and his only surgery on the right eye was an uncomplicated cataract surgery 14 years before. On physical examination, he was found to have keratic precipitates and a white posterior capsular plaque in the right eye. He was treated with a right pars plana vitrectomy and intraocular lens removal. Microbiological classification of the samples revealed the presence of a Leuconostoc species within the vitreous humor and coagulase-negative staphylococci on the lens. Two months after placement of the intraocular lens, he achieved a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/200 in his right eye. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of delayed-onset endophthalmitis occurring more than 10 years after an uncomplicated cataract surgery. This case highlights a highly unusual presentation of delayed-onset endophthalmitis and reports a potential novel microbiological cause of plaque formation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".