Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine the correlation between reading skills for elementary school students with fluent English and Korean reading skills. The subjects of the study are 25 elementary school 3rd∼6th graders participating in the English Village reading camp. The students read storybooks 12 times a quarter, four hours a week, on variety of topics appropriate for their level. The English reading diagnostic test was measured with the Acadience Reading K-6 assessment, and the Korean was applied with the Reading Ocean, Korean reading diagnostic test. The results of the study are as follows. First, overall, Korean reading competency was higher than English reading competency in the reading index. By level of evaluation, there was a greater gap in English reading competency regardless of grade. Second, the correlation of the two diagnostic domains at different levels of evaluation showed a relatively high correlation at the G2 level. Third, the analysis of the total score showed that the higher the level of Korean reading competency, the greater the level of English reading competency. Based on the research results, the author proposes the academic and educational implications necessary for the development of an English reading diagnostic system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it