Efficient Density Ratio-Guided Subsampling of Conditional GANs, With Conditioning on a Class or a Continuous Variable.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, subsampling or refining images generated from unconditional generative adversarial networks (GANs) has been actively studied to improve the overall image quality. Unfortunately, these methods are often observed less effective or inefficient in handling conditional GANs (cGANs) -- conditioning on a class (aka class-conditional GANs) or a continuous variable (aka continuous cGANs or CcGANs). In this work, we introduce an effective and efficient subsampling scheme, named conditional density ratio-guided rejection sampling (cDR-RS), to sample high-quality images from cGANs. Specifically, we first develop a novel conditional density ratio estimation method, termed cDRE-F-cSP, by proposing the conditional Softplus (cSP) loss and an improved feature extraction mechanism. We then derive the error bound of a density ratio model trained with the cSP loss. Finally, we accept or reject a fake image in terms of its estimated conditional density ratio. A filtering scheme is also developed to increase fake images' label consistency without losing diversity when sampling from CcGANs. We extensively test the effectiveness and efficiency of cDR-RS in sampling from both class-conditional GANs and CcGANs on five benchmark datasets. When sampling from class-conditional GANs, cDR-RS outperforms modern state-of-the-art methods by a large margin (except DRE-F-SP+RS) in terms of effectiveness. Although the effectiveness of cDR-RS is often comparable to that of DRE-F-SP+RS, cDR-RS is substantially more efficient. When sampling from CcGANs, the superiority of cDR-RS is even more noticeable in terms of both effectiveness and efficiency. Notably, with the consumption of reasonable computational resources, cDR-RS can substantially reduce Label Score without decreasing the diversity of CcGAN-generated images, while other methods often need to trade much diversity for slightly improved Label Score.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".