MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214075146 · doi:10.1115/imece2001/dsc-24504

Development of Intelligent Hierarchical Control for a Hydraulic Manipulator

2001· article· en· W3214075146 on OpenAlexaff
Roya Rahbari, C. W. deSilva

Bibliographic record

VenueDynamic Systems and Control · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)ActuatorLayer (electronics)Computer scienceHierarchyControl engineeringPID controllerHierarchical control systemControl theory (sociology)Intelligent controlFuzzy logicPosition (finance)Fuzzy control systemHydraulic machineryServoServomechanismHydraulic cylinderControl systemServomotorControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTemperature controlMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the development of a hierarchical intelligent controller for a hydraulic manipulator, which has been designed to be an integral part of an automated machine for mechanical processing of salmon. The developed controller for this hydraulic actuator is a three-layer hierarchical system. In the bottom layer of the hierarchy, a conventional proportional plus derivative (PD) controller is used to control the position of the cutting blade. The middle layer monitors the performance of the manipulator, preprocesses the response signals, and extracts the performance parameters, based on a step-input response. The top layer infers the tuning actions for the PD servo. The knowledge base for tuning the low level controller has been developed and represented by fuzzy rulesbase modules. The development of this hierarchical control system is discussed and some experimental results are given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDynamic Systems and ControlSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207