The Quebec novel and its adaptations: distance from the original and ideological dissimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En): Film adaptation of the novel illustrate different relations of the film to the source text: the complete fidelity, transformations consequent on the passage from literature to film, modifications of the text's signification on the esthetic and ideological level.Quebec literature and cinema are sensible to the non-artistic discourses present in the Quebec society.For these reason film adaptation of Quebec novel can be considered as an example of "ideological dissimulation" according to the political and social context contemporary to the realization of the movie.The adaptation can either extenuate the novel's ideological signification or use a canonical text to deliver its own message reinforced by the film relation to the literary original.The analyze of two novels, considered as classical, of Quebec literature -Bonheur d'occasion (1945) by Gabrielle Roy and Maria Chapdelaine (1916) by Louis Hémon -and their filmic adaptations by Claude Fournier (Bonheur d'occasion, 1983) and Gilles Carle (Maria Chapdelaine, 1983) illustrates these different strategies of "ideological dissimulation".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".