MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214121385 · doi:10.35328/kebidanan.v10i2.2070

KEPATUHAN IBU HAMIL DALAM KONSUMSI TABLET FE DI WILAYAH KERJA UPTD PUSKESMAS TENAYAN RAYA

2021· article· en· W3214121385 on OpenAlexaff
Fatma Nadia, Rika Mianna, Ahmad Mustolih

Bibliographic record

VenueAl-Insyirah Midwifery Jurnal Ilmu Kebidanan (Journal of Midwifery Sciences) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTest (biology)PregnancyHealth educationEnvironmental healthFamily medicineObstetricsNursingPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compliance pregnant women implement a recommendation health workers to consume tablet fe pregnancy.This behavior can be influenced by knowledge, attitudes and education level. This report aims to review the knowledge, attitudes and levels of compliance pregnant women in consume tablet fe in the work area UPTD Puskesmas Tenayan Raya. This research using design research cross sectional with respondents as much 89 pregnant women .Where taken as random sample of sampling. Data analyzed by test chi square using spss 16,0 with a singnifikan p <0,05. Research results obtained that is no link between knowledge (p value = 0,014 ), attitude ( p value = 0,031 and education ( p value = 0,046 ) of compliance pregnant women in consume fe.Conclusions obtained bahwasannya knowledge, attitudes and education level with links to conduct smoking students, that suggested to the health workers would motivate pregnant women as well as never in providing information about the importance of consume tablet fe against what they contain, these figures mortalitas and morbilitas on the reduced. Keywords : Knowledge, attitude, education, compliance consumption Fe

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAl-Insyirah Midwifery Jurnal Ilmu Kebidanan (Journal of Midwifery Sciences)Same topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207