<scp>CDX2</scp>and<scp>SATB2</scp>positivity in pilomatrix carcinoma: Avoiding an erroneous diagnosis of cutaneous metastasis of gastrointestinal origin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An 80-year-old female presented with a slowly growing 2-cm nodule on her shoulder over a 1-year period. Histopathologic sections of a biopsy specimen showed a multinodular, dermal-based basaloid tumor with areas of clear-cell change, stromal induction, as well as significant cytologic atypia and atypical mitotic activity. An initial investigation revealed positive staining of CDX2, a well-known marker of tumors of gastrointestinal origin. The case was referred to our dermatopathology service for consultation to determine if the lesion was in keeping with a cutaneous metastasis. On receipt of the case, an extended immunohistochemical panel was performed including SATB2, which displayed a similar pattern of staining as seen with CDX2. Although pathologists are most familiar with CDX2 and SATB2 as markers of gastrointestinal origin, the recent dermatopathology literature highlights that primary adnexal lesions of the skin also display positivity for CDX2 and can exhibit SATB2 positivity. We share a case of pilomatrix carcinoma with positive expression of nuclear CDX2 and SATB2, adding to the recent literature to (a) increase recognition of this staining pattern in hair follicle tumors, and (b) discuss briefly the shared molecular underpinnings in the tumorigenesis of gastrointestinal tumors and tumors of hair follicle origin that help clarify this underrecognized immunohistochemical pattern.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".