MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3214151346 · doi:10.1149/ma2021-02451373mtgabs

Determination of Au and Pt Current Collector Activity to Avoid Interference in the Screening of Metal Oxide Catalyst Activity in SOECs

2021· article· en· W3214151346 on OpenAlexaff
Mykhailo Pidburtnyi, Haris Masood Ansari, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalysisElectrolysisMaterials scienceElectrolyteOxideCurrent collectorChemical engineeringNoble metalMetalInorganic chemistryIonic bondingElectrodeChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since solid oxides electrolysis cells (SOECs) represent a promising technology for efficient CO 2 conversion to useful chemical products, there is a demand for durable, highly active, and inexpensive electrode materials for use in these systems. Many metal oxide catalysts suitable for CO 2 reduction have been studied, including La 0.3 Me 0.7 Fe 0.7 Cr 0.3 O 3-δ (Me = Ca, Sr; LMFCr), developed by our research group. These catalysts have comparable activity and are much more stable than conventional metal-ionic conductor cermets, known for coke formation and sulfur poisoning. However, while observed catalyst stability can be easily compared for different materials, their activity is harder to differentiate. This is because the overwhelming majority of materials tested are porous in nature, thus making their true active area unknown. To avoid this issue, we are working on determining LMFCr activity and the CO 2 reduction mechanism using thin, smooth catalyst layers, obtained by pulsed laser deposition on a YSZ-(001) electrolyte, then using noble metals as the current collector. Preliminary studies of current collector-LMFCr thin film-CO2/CO combinations suggest that the current collector/LMFCr interfaces may have an electrochemical activity that would contribute measurably to that of the LMFCr-gas dual phase boundary interface. Assuming that the metal/LMFCr interface activity would be similar to that at the metal/ionic conductor triple phase boundary, the goal of the present work is to determine the catalytic activity of both Pt and Au, which are the most common current collector materials used in fuel environments, towards the CO 2 reduction reaction, with the activity of these metal/YSZ interfaces toward oxygen reduction used as a reference. Two different full cell configurations were used in this work. In one direction, porous Au or Pt layers were produced by metal paste deposition onto both sides of the YSZ electrolyte and then sintered at 600°C. A polymeric YSZ precursor was then infiltrated into the porous metal backbone and sintered at 750°C to form the YSZ phase. To ensure that the counter was as non-polarizable as possible, Pt in air was chosen due to its high activity in oxygen-containing environments, while also depositing it over 5X the area and ensuring 2X the thickness of the catalyst layer at the working electrode. In the porous electrode configuration, the working electrode was exposed to the testing gas, while the counter electrode was exposed in air to achieve as high an activity as possible. In the second configuration, 0.3 mm thick Pt or Au wires were attached to a 250 µm thick YSZ electrolyte to form a point-contact working electrode. A porous LSM-YSZ composite with a geometric surface area of 0.5 cm 2 was painted on the opposite side of the electrolyte to serve as the counter electrode, exposing it to the same gas as the working electrode. Electrochemical performance testing for both cell types was conducted in air and CO 2 environments at 750°C with a flow rate of 50 SCCM. Morphological and compositional investigation as well as microelectrode triple phase length determination was done using SEM and EDS elemental mapping. Analysis of the EIS and CV data for the porous electrodes showed that the Pt/YSZ and Au/YSZ electrodes are both active towards the oxygen and CO 2 reduction reactions. Au is less so, showing up to 40 times lower activity towards oxygen reduction and 3 times lower activity than for CO 2 reduction. This would imply that Au is the preferred current collector material for future electrochemical evaluation of metal oxide catalysts. However, SEM studies indicated that Pt and Au cells had different metal particle sizes, so the triple phase boundary length may be not comparable. In addition, the double layer capacitance, often used to estimate the triple phase boundary length, could not be used here due to the high surface inhomogeneity and distribution of time constants across these catalyst layers. To eliminate these issues, microelectrode studies are currently being conducted. Preliminary results show that Au/YSZ is at least 8 times less active in air and 60 times less active in the CO 2 environment than Pt/YSZ, with the activity of both of these electrodes controlled by precisely controlled triple phase boundary length determination via SEM. The cyclic voltammetry data also indicate that CO 2 reduction does not occur at Au/YSZ through the full potential range (0-1.6 V vs. the counter electrode), which also implies a very low catalytic activity of Au/YSZ. Further studies, including comparison with the porous composite electrode data, are underway. In addition, determination of the reaction steps is being carried out from EIS data equivalent circuit fitting as well as verification through the use of distribution relaxation times technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207