MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3214156939 · doi:10.1039/d1cc05522d

A self-quenching fluorescence probe-mediated exponential isothermal amplification system for highly sensitive and specific detection of microRNAs

2021· article· en· W3214156939 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Zhao, Jiandong Wu, Xiaosong Wu, Guoqing Deng, Yong Liu, Francis Lin, Ling Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Anhui ProvinceChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsFluorescenceQuenching (fluorescence)Loop-mediated isothermal amplificationIsothermal processmicroRNAExponential functionChemistryBiophysicsMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Biological systemChromatographyThermodynamicsBiochemistryPhysicsDNABiologyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We designed an efficient self-quenching fluorescence probe and constructed this probe-mediated exponential isothermal amplification system for miRNA detection. Owing to the significant improvement in the detective signal-to-background ratio, a wide dynamic range of 9 orders of magnitude and a limit of detection as low as 0.08 aM can be easily achieved in a single step. Furthermore, benefiting from the additional advantages of high specificity and biocompatibility, the proposed method has been demonstrated to be capable of accurately quantifying miRNA biomarkers in serum, which will provide promising perspectives for clinical diagnosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Communications→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→